![]() |
| Lidia Thorpe’s Explosive Threat [Video Below] |
|
Key Reactions
|
Source
|
Quote
|
|---|---|---|
|
Labor Party
|
Tanya Plibersek
|
“Absolutely irresponsible”
|
|
Media
|
Nat Barr (Sunrise)
|
“Demands action from Albanese”
|
|
Public (X)
|
Various users
|
“Unhinged threat… charge her”
|
|
Conservatives
|
Lee Hanson (One Nation)
|
“Gobsmacked by the threat”
|
What Happens Next? The Bigger Picture for Australian PoliticsAs of October 13, 2025, no formal charges have been laid against Thorpe, but the Senate could yet investigate under rules against threats to public institutions. Her office has remained tight-lipped, with supporters framing the comment as hyperbolic activism rather than a literal plan. Still, in an era of rising political polarization – from U.S. election rhetoric to global protests – words like these risk normalizing extremism.Thorpe’s threat underscores a deeper malaise: When voices feel unheard, do they whisper or roar? For Indigenous and Palestinian advocates, it’s a symptom of systemic neglect. For her critics, it’s a dangerous escalation that undermines the very democracy she seeks to reform. Either way, this isn’t fading quietly – expect Senate showdowns, more rallies, and endless op-eds.What do you think? Is Thorpe a hero speaking truth to power, or has she gone too far? Drop your thoughts in the comments below. And if you’re in Australia, keep an eye on how this plays out in the halls of Parliament – because if history is any guide, Lidia Thorpe doesn’t back down.
.embed-container { position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden; max-width: 100%; } .embed-container iframe, .embed-container object, .embed-container embed { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; }


