Home Blog Page 69

Putin Launching motor traffic on completed sections of Taurida motorway

-


Vladimir Putin working trip to the Republic of Crimea, Vladimir Putin took part in the launch of motor traffic on the finished sections of the Taurida motorway. 

President Putin drove an Aurus limousine along a newly-built section of the Taurida motorway with Minister of Transport Yevgeny Ditrikh, VAD Director General Valery Abramov and VAD Chief Production Engineer Andrei Volkov.

Vladimir Putin drives an Aurus limousine along a newly built section of the Taurida motorway. Photo Kremlin

President Putin inspected information boards highlighting the stages of building the motorway and spoke briefly with VAD workers. While speaking with the workers, the President noted that this road would spur the development of the entire peninsula. It is just as important as the power sector and water supply. Regional water shortages will also be resolved. All this allows Crimea to develop at the desired pace. Vladimir Putin also said that the Development of Crimea programme had been extended until 2024, and that it envisaged the construction of an additional 200 km of roads. 

After that, Vladimir Putin gave the green light to launching vehicle traffic along the newly-built sections.

The four-lane Taurida motorway has first technical category status and is located on the border of two Russian entities, namely, the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol, a city of federal importance. The motorway is slated for completion in late 2023. A 250.7-km section between Kerch and Sevastopol will open before the year is out.

Under the road construction project, 95 engineering structures, including bridges and overpasses, as well as 18 transport interchanges and 30 pedestrian crossings with elevators for people with disabilities, will be built

Source: President of Russia Kremlin Moscow



Garnaut will conduct a comprehensive government examination of the Bradfield scheme.

-


An independent, expert panel chaired by Professor Ross Garnaut “LOL” will conduct a comprehensive government examination of the Bradfield inland irrigation scheme.

Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk today announced the panel, which will also include Queensland Farmers Federation chief executive officer Dr Georgina Davis and James Cook University Professor Allan Dale.

“Queensland has a plan for economic recovery, building on traditional strengths like agriculture and a $50 billion infrastructure commitment,” she said.

“We know that access to affordable water for irrigation can foster expanded agribusiness and jobs in regional Queensland.

“As the globe faces harsh economic headwinds, it’s important to continue to capitalise on opportunities here in our state.

“Projects like this have the potential to support a new generation of farmers, landholders and regional communities if it’s done in a way that is realistic and affordable.

“By continuing to have a strong health response, we’re able to look towards the future with exciting projects like this and keep delivering on Queensland’s plan for economic recovery.”



The panel’s job will be to assess the financial, economic, environmental, social and technical viability of a Bradfield Scheme, or “Bradfield like” concepts, as well as make recommendations for any further assessment.



Natural Resources Minister Dr Anthony Lynham said nation-building water infrastructure like a Bradfield scheme was usually driven by a national government.



“The Premier first raised the Bradfield Scheme in October last year and offered to work with the Commonwealth Government on a revised scheme,” Dr Lynham said.



“The Queensland Government is not waiting any longer: we are taking the lead and comprehensively re-examining a Bradfield Scheme concept.”



The panel’s terms of reference include: considering the economic benefits to regional communities and agricultural production, especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and related recession.  



Opportunities for renewable energy generation, complementary hydroelectric power generation, hydrogen production opportunities, and resources sector development.



Integrating with complementary infrastructure, including the CopperString project.



Dr Lynham said the new examination would look at the project from a 21st century perspective, including considering climate change, the impact on the Great Barrier Reef of diverting natural water flows, native title, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ cultural connections.



Minister for Infrastructure Cameron Dick said delivering Queensland’s path to recovery from COVID-19 meant ensuring that proper consideration is given to projects like the Bradfield Scheme.



“Delivering infrastructure Queensland needs will play a critical role in our state’s recovery,” Mr Dick said.



“That’s why we are delivering on our program of infrastructure work including $13.9 billion this financial year, as revealed in our recently released Capital Update 2020.



“This expert panel will have the knowledge and critical thinking required to ensure that projects that make up the Bradfield Scheme will grow our economy, and are planned, funded and delivered properly.” 



Member for Townsville Scott Stewart welcomed the panel’s appointment.



“It’s easy to talk about the Bradfield Scheme: the Palaszczuk Government is going to put money behind it and fund a 21st-century expert re-examination,” he said.



Member for Thuringowa Aaron Harper said significant investigations were already underway into projects that could be part of a Bradfield-style scheme.



“Any Bradfield project must start with water storage in the north – and that’s already happening,” he said.



“There’s three business cases underway or in hand – raising Burdekin Falls Dam, Hells Gate Dam and Big Rocks Weir and Urannah Dam has been declared a coordinated project.”



The panel is due to report back to within a year.



The Palaszczuk Government has committed $1.2 billion to water infrastructure since 2017, creating almost 2300 jobs in regional Queensland.



BACKGROUND



Engineer Dr John Bradfield devised the Bradfield Scheme concept in the 1930s.  



He proposed to use the floodwaters, and a portion of the normal flow, of the Tully, Herbert, Burdekin, Clarke and Flinders River to create a new permanent river that would “traverse Queensland” from near Hughenden to Windorah and the Queensland border. The goal was to intensify agriculture and population in the south-west.



Dr Bradfield’s original concept also envisaged hydroelectric power generated to pump water.



The scheme would require a number of water storages, as well as a tunnel and an aqueduct through the Flinders Range.



Attribution: Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy The Honourable Dr Anthony Lynham



Source: The State of Queensland
(Department of the Premier and Cabinet)



Dan Andrews, State of Disaster will continue in Victoria for at least a further 11 days.

Ensuring we maintain the measures we need in the fight against coronavirus – and the hard-won gains of Victorians are not lost – the State of Disaster will continue in Victoria for at least a further 11 days.



-


Previously set to expire at 6 pm today, the State of Disaster will be renewed until 11.59 pm on 13 September 2020, bringing it into line with the existing State of Emergency declaration and allowing advice about any future continuation to be made once the Government’s roadmap for easing restrictions has been released.

That means – as our public health experts assess our appropriate next steps – the current restrictions, the State of Disaster and the State of Emergency can be aligned and their extension can be considered together.

Engagement with industry and communities will continue today and tomorrow, with Victoria’s roadmap to be released on Sunday 6 September.

The introduction of Stage 4 restrictions in metropolitan Melbourne and Stage 3 restrictions in regional Victoria have seen a steady decrease in the number of active cases of coronavirus in Victoria. But this is not over yet.



The State of Disaster is a legal mechanism to underpin a number of the current Stage 4 restrictions, including the curfew and the 5km limit for exercise and shopping within metropolitan Melbourne.



Even with the vast majority of Victorians doing the right thing, the State of Disaster allows Victoria Police and Protective Services Officers to enforce the public health directions for those who are doing the wrong thing. This practically means that officers can ask for a name and address to check people are within 5kms of their home or enter a home or business to check residents or staff are complying with gathering limits.



Following advice of the Minister for Police and Emergency Services and the Emergency Management Commissioner,  a State of Disaster can be introduced if there is an emergency that constitutes or is likely to constitute a significant and widespread danger to life or property in Victoria.



A State of Disaster cannot be extended in blocks longer than one month and must be publicly reported back to Parliament.



To find out more information about coronavirus call 1800 675 398 or visit www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/coronavirus.



Quotes attributable to Premier Daniel Andrews



“So many Victorians have worked so hard and sacrificed so much in our fight against this virus – and our strategy is working. But we have to make sure all of that effort has been worthwhile – we must stay the course.” 



“We’ve seen how quickly this virus can spread. Continuing the State of Disaster will give us the tools we need to keep enforcing the rules that are keeping Victorians safe.”



Quotes attributable to Minister for Police and Emergency Services Lisa Neville



“A State of Disaster is never a decision we make lightly – and it won’t be in place a moment longer than it needs to be. But we are at a critical point now and we have to do everything we can to hold onto the gains we’ve made.”



“The majority of Victorians are doing the right thing, but we are still seeing examples of people who put the work of everyone else at risk. This is about giving Victoria Police the tools they need as we keep driving down cases.“



Source: Premier of Victoria Dan Andrews

Hanson-Young; Climate change pushing our environment and our natural world to the brink.

-


Senator Hanson-Young (South Australia): Environment Senate Speech  I move: That the Senate take note of the answer given by the Minister representing the Prime Minister (Senator Cormann) to a question without notice asked by Senator Hanson-Young today relating to the environment.

I asked Senator Cormann about the government’s plans to rush through legislation that is ultimately going to weaken Australia’s environmental laws and to make it easier for big mining corporations and big gas companies to continue to destroy Australia’s precious environment and to put in harm’s way our native wildlife and animals.

We know that the environment is already suffering greatly. It is in a huge state of decline. We know climate change, land clearing, pollution are pushing our environment and our natural world to the brink. And what do we have from this government? More ways to make more money for these companies while destroying our environment, and it’s being done under the cover of COVID-19. I ask the minister: why on earth would we want to hand powers over in the states without any form of strong environmental standards?


We know that big intervention from the Commonwealth government, important intervention from the Commonwealth government, has actually saved some of the most iconic parts of Australia’s environment—the Great Barrier Reef, the Franklin. Whaling stopped in Western Australia because the federal government stepped in, when state governments were failing to protect our precious species and our environment. We would have oil rigs on the Great Barrier Reef, the Franklin would be dammed and whaling may still be going on in Western Australia if the federal government at the time had not intervened. Real leaders like former Prime Minister Bob Hawke and former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser stood up for their nation’s environment, not like these cowards over here on the red benches, who do nothing but hand over more and more ways for big corporations to destroy our environment in the name of profit.



I’m not going to take much of what Minister Cormann has said seriously, because this guy doesn’t really know anything about protecting the environment. Minister Cormann doesn’t really care about the environment. I was interested to read in the new book by Marion Wilkinson, The Carbon Club, that Mr Cormann’s experience with the environment was huddling together on a weekly basis with Cory Bernardi—remember him?—to destroy carbon-protecting, environment-protecting legislation in this place. Minister Cormann has no idea what he’s talking about when it comes to looking after the environment. This government simply don’t care. They can’t be trusted, they don’t care and they’re trying to make an easy path for big corporations to keep polluting, to keep mining, to keep logging and to keep making profits off the back of Australia’s environment and the habitat of our wildlife.



I asked a question in relation to Rio Tinto. The reason I asked that is because the head of Rio Tinto is currently in Australia. He just arrived two weeks ago. He’s been through quarantine. I was listening today about all the Australians still stranded overseas trying to get home. Well, we know one person who managed to get into Australia. What is he doing here? He’s meeting with the traditional owners in Western Australia who own the caves that his company blew up. He’s having to apologise because we didn’t have laws that were strong enough to stop this environmental vandalism. So if there’s anyone in this country right now who knows why we need stronger environmental laws, you’d think it would be the head of Rio Tinto. Why on earth would we trust that this government are going to do the right thing by our country’s environment? Their track record is atrocious. I call on Rio Tinto to stand with the Greens and to argue that there needs to be stronger environmental protections and to declare their opposition to this push from the government, because they, of all people, know firsthand what happens when there aren’t proper protections in place. You know what happens? Big companies blow up the ancient Aboriginal heritage and destroy our environment.



Source: Transcript and Image Parliament of Australia Website 

The Greens Senator Di Natale last Senate Speech

-


Di Natale Senate Video Conference of last speech
: Let me begin by acknowledging the Wurundjeri people of the Kulin nation from whose land I am speaking today, the Ngunawal and Ngambri people on whose land our national parliament meets and the traditional owners of the lands from right across the country.

Mr President, I hope you don’t mind me saying that, after announcing my resignation—I’m going to share this with the rest of the world—you sent me a cheeky text message saying that you wouldn’t kick me out of the Senate during my final speech. Now I’m not sure how you’re going to do that from Melbourne, but I’m going to do my best to behave.

I didn’t expect that my final speech would take place in a virtual parliament from a locked-down city amid a global pandemic. It’s a pandemic that’s causing untold suffering and hardship across the world. It’s a pandemic that follows a devastating summer of bushfires. And it’s a pandemic that concludes my decade in this parliament. Over that decade, six different prime ministers have come and gone, climate change remains a festering sore on our body politic, economic inequality has been entrenched, race politics has reared its ugly head again and the gap with our First Nations peoples has grown. If ever there was a time for deep reflection and for a reset of our national politics, this is it.

Like many people right across the country, I’ve had plenty of time to reflect these past few months, and I leave the Australian parliament knowing that, despite the turmoil of the past decade, our nation is a better place because of what we Greens have achieved.

One of the first votes that I cast in this place is one of my proudest, as we delivered the world’s best climate laws. The Clean Energy Act was a result of the power-sharing arrangement between the Labor Party, the Greens and Independents, and it showed what could be achieved when politicians ditched the partisanship and cooperated in the national interest. Not long after that, I was fortunate to be able to negotiate a $4 billion dental package to provide millions of children with free Medicare funded dental care.



‘How good’s this?’ I thought. Thanks to the Greens, we had a price on carbon, we had billions of dollars flowing into renewable energy projects and we had the first stage of our Denticare plan to roll out Medicare-funded dental care to Australians across the country. In politics, just as in life, sometimes you don’t know how good things are until they’re gone. That power-sharing arrangement may have been tarnished by former prime ministers’ quests for vengeance, but it was one of the most productive periods in the nation’s history.



The Abbott government that followed is infamous for many reasons, but the jaw-dropping 2014 budget, with its full-frontal assault on Medicare and on schools, is seared in my memory. It was like a horror story. Each election, millions of people vote for the Greens because they share our values. But they also vote for us to hold bad governments to account, and that was never more important than during those Abbott years.



But the great privilege was taking on the leadership of the Australian Greens just as that government ended, and I like to think that those two things may have been connected. Leadership was a responsibility that weighed very heavily on me. As leader, I confronted successive conservative governments and spent much of my time fighting their attacks on the environment and on people doing it tough. But I’m also proud that, along the way, we achieved some real wins for people. Securing $100 million in funding for Landcare as part of our solution to the backpacker tax stand-off was a good day.



Before I was elected to parliament, I often thought these things were the product of careful deliberation and a thorough policy process. But it was a tense meeting with the leader of the Senate in the corridor that allowed us to achieve a great outcome for farmers and for the environment. It took a 28-hour sitting to democratise voting in the Senate after the Labor Party reversed its position and threw everything at us. The Greens policy was based on the very novel idea that, in a democracy, the outcome of an election should reflect how people vote, not backroom deals between political parties. There were lots of wonderful offerings during that long and ugly debate that night, but listening to a senator compare the bill to his colonoscopy had me questioning my life choices.



After years of campaigning against multinational tax-dodging, we negotiated important laws that increased penalties on corporations for tax avoidance and profit-shifting. Labor attacked us because the laws didn’t go far enough, but when will Labor learn that you can’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good? Sam Dastyari, of course, led the attack with memes and posters and even a billboard decrying ‘Di Natale’s dirty deals’. Sam, of course, was an expert on the subject of dirty deals.



Working across the political divide carries real risk for a party like ours. We didn’t benefit electorally from the power-sharing arrangement with the then Gillard government, but we got some really important policy wins. Getting good policy outcomes on the rare occasions we negotiated with the Liberals also gave our rivals plenty of ammunition, and it did cut across our own message. But I firmly believe that we owe it to the millions of people who vote for us to roll up our sleeves and deliver Greens policy for them.



Leading our team in walking out of parliament during Senator Hanson’s first speech, rather than sitting in quiet acceptance of her racist views or, worse still, shaking her hand afterwards is another proud moment. Within hours of doing that, our office was flooded with calls, mostly from people from the Australian Muslim community, many in tears, just thankful that they were not alone. Often, during my time in parliament, I felt like I was shouting in the wind. But, in that moment, I knew that our message of solidarity was being heard where it mattered most.



I’m proud to have led the party that supported marriage equality long before it was a popular cause and worked tirelessly with campaigners from across the community for decades until it became law. Our work behind the scenes in exposing the corporate greed in our banking and financial sector was critical in helping secure a banking royal commission. When we first advocated for a levy on the big banks, the Liberals slammed us for our economy-wrecking socialist policies. A decade later, they introduced one. It gave me great satisfaction to be upstairs in the ABC’s studios at Parliament House doing a radio interview with Senator Paterson, freshly out of the Institute of Public Affairs and now defending another sensible Greens idea.



Greens legislation for a national integrity commission to root out corruption was rejected outright by both sides for almost a decade, but we finally won. Now it’s time to make sure that an anticorruption watchdog is up to the job of fighting corruption and is not just window dressing. Medicinal cannabis would still be illegal in Australia if it weren’t for the Greens. It took our bill to gain cross-party support and joint press conferences with people like renowned Greens hater and LNP senator Ian Macdonald for the government to finally start listening. We’ve been a lone voice in this place on sensible drug policy, with reforms like pill testing, supervised injecting facilities and adult-use cannabis. And I know there are MPs in this place who agree with us; I just wish they wouldn’t find their voice only once they’ve left parliament.



The citizenship scandal that saw us lose two fine senators was one of my toughest times in that place. The first phone call, from Senator Ludlam, came out of the blue, and it triggered a series of events that cast a shadow over the 45th Parliament. A Perth lawyer had been digging around and he discovered that Scott had left New Zealand as a three-year-old and had not renounced his citizenship. I initially thought that the second call, just days later, from Senator Waters was a joke. She told me that she was still waiting for legal confirmation but she believed that she had unknowingly held Canadian citizenship.



The legal advice was clear: they were both ineligible to sit in parliament. It’s an archaic section of our Constitution and it needs to be changed, but there was no question about what to do next. In the space of a week they had both resigned and I had lost my two deputy leaders. We had let down our members and supporters, the Prime Minister called us sloppy and extraordinarily negligent and the right-wing media went into overdrive, as they do. Of course, we all know what happened in the weeks and months that followed: politicians from all sides were outed, except this time there were delays, denials, blame and expensive High Court challenges at the taxpayers’ expense. It’s one thing to talk about personal responsibility in this place; it’s another thing to demonstrate it.



So I leave here feeling incredibly proud of our team, who have behaved with integrity and achieved so much. I leave with a deep sense of personal fulfilment that comes from fighting for a cause bigger than yourself. But, if I’m being really honest, I also leave knowing that successive parliaments in which I’ve served have failed to achieve lasting reforms on the things that matter: climate change, homelessness, job insecurity, mental illness and protection of our environment.



It’s easy to put these flaws down to the personal failings of individual prime ministers, but the failings of the past decade are much bigger than that. The very structures that underpin our democracy—many of them established a century ago, have been incapable of responding to the challenges before us. We are currently living through a pandemic of which we were warned but unprepared for. Our National Medical Stockpile was inadequate. Health workers were unable to get masks and we lacked the basic capacity to make our own. Victorians are now locked up in their houses because of the failure of a quarantine system, which failed due to a culture of outsourcing and privatisation. Ongoing outbreaks in aged-care facilities have revealed the ugly truth of how we care, or don’t care, for the elderly.



We were warned about the threat of a global pandemic, and we’ve been warned time and again about the threat of catastrophic climate change. And yet the coalition, the Labor Party, the business community and even sections of the union movement are divided over this issue. Despite having the technological tools to address it, despite significant public support and despite a litany of climate fuelled disasters, they remain incapable of reaching internal agreement. The Liberal Party once believed in protecting the environment—in the notion of conservation. Today they’re dominated by a reactionary rump that represents corporate rent-seekers who want protection from technological change, like renewable energy.



Today, with the climate crisis spiralling out of control, Labor’s climate policy is weaker than it was a decade ago. The Labor Party lost me many, many years ago, but they’re going to lose a lot more people if they don’t muster up a bit of courage and take a stand on climate change. The Business Council worked hand-in-glove with the Abbott government to tear down our climate laws, only to leave their members hopelessly exposed to the risks posed by climate change. All they offer now is lip-service in support of climate action but criticism of anyone with a meaningful plan to do something about it. And during last year’s election campaign we had a powerful mining union in Queensland forcing candidates to sign a pledge in support of coalmining and denying them a chance of a long-term future.



Not so long ago, our major newspapers would hold these institutions and our political parties to account. Today they host fundraisers for them. The dominant Murdoch media continues to shamelessly promote climate denialism and the ABC has been worn down by relentless attacks and ongoing budget cuts. Social media, which was getting started a decade ago, promised to take power away from media moguls and to democratise debate by giving citizens a voice. Instead, it has become a platform for extremes, where conspiracy theories flourish and where anonymity plays to the worst of human instincts. Our institutions no longer reflect who we are or who we want to become. We urgently need a new era of sweeping political and economic reform, and it has to start by making our democracy work for people and not for corporations.



The first political fight I saw up close in this place was when I watched a cashed-up gambling lobby descend on Parliament House like a pack of vultures and shamelessly sink popular pokies reform. Since that time, I’ve seen the same story play out over and over and over again, whether it’s the mining tax, alcohol regulation or action on climate change. The formula they use is always the same: keep the donations flowing; deploy an army of lobbyists, preferably politicians, so they can exploit their connections; host fundraisers; run big campaigns against anyone who threatens your bottom line; pay thousands to get a seat at the minister’s table, and the bigger the cheque, the better the seat. That awful new fence that surrounds Parliament House now is symbolic of this rotten culture. We’ve closed off the building to the community but we’ve thrown the gates wide open to vested interests with deep pockets. A representative democracy should represent the full diversity of its citizens. Instead, ours represents a political class who tread the well-worn path of student politics to political staffer to parliamentary politics.



Our parliament and the Australian nation are two different countries. We need more women, more people from different cultural and economic backgrounds, more young people in our parliament. It shouldn’t take a pandemic to force the introduction of technologies like the one we’re using right now, which is going to make it easier for parents and carers and people with disabilities—those from rural backgrounds—to engage in our democracy.



Our parliament is not representative of how people vote, either. The National Party, with about four per cent of the national vote, returns 16 lower house MPs. The Greens, with almost three times that vote, returns one MP. Yet for nearly two decades a tiny, overrepresented, anticlimate party has been crucial in blocking action on climate change. If we had proportional representation so that our national parliament fairly represented the wishes of voters, the climate change debate would be largely over.



This pandemic has demonstrated the critical role of looking after people. We’ve got to get our democracy working for people. The pandemic has also exposed the lie that government can’t support those in need. For years, the low rate of Newstart condemned people to a life of poverty, and that has only changed because millions more Australians have been forced to live that reality. We now effectively have a universal income, and it should stay. We’ve been gradually heading towards a two-tier, privatised, American style health system, but we know the best insurance against any pandemic is Medicare and our precious public health system. The crisis has again exposed a tough reality for people in insecure and inadequate housing. We need a massive new build of public housing, which would create jobs and investment.



Online communication has been critical for people during this period of isolation, keeping people connected and allowing businesses to continue functioning. It’s now an essential service. Free access to high-quality internet would give many more people opportunity to flourish.



And real action on climate change is nation building. Phasing out dirty, expensive, coal-fired power and gas and replacing it with renewable energy means thousands of new jobs. There are jobs, too, in building network infrastructure and new storage systems and in the electrification of our transport system.



I do leave parliament hopeful that things will change; I do. Unlike the response to climate change, state and federal governments have ditched the partisanship and have been guided by evidence in responding to this pandemic. It’s absolutely true, some terrible mistakes have been made, and they deserve scrutiny. But I also want to acknowledge the many sensible, life-saving decisions, too. There’s also a strong sense of solidarity in the community. It’s been a really, really tough year for many people. Many people are struggling. But the vast majority of people understand that this shared sacrifice is required in order to get us through this together. It’s also a moment when people have been given space to think deeply about what’s important in life. We’re social creatures. We rely on human contact. We rely on each other. It’s a moment like this that puts a lie to the dog-eat-dog, rampant individualism that has formed the basis of our politics for far too long.



I’m optimistic because social movements are building around the world, too, and throughout history it’s these movements that have driven change. Right now collective action on climate change, racism, sexism and inequality is gathering steam. I remember leaving parliament once, feeling especially demoralised after a particularly brutal sitting week, and it was the tens of thousands of passionate, engaged young people at the climate strike the following day that gave me the strength and energy to keep fighting. I want to thank them.



I leave politics feeling confident about the Greens, too. I joined the Victorian Greens two decades ago. We had no state or federal representation, and over what is a short period of time we’ve elected dozens of state and federal MPs and local government councils right across the country. Our party is strong and resilient. We have the support of millions of Australians, and we’re the only party with genuine solutions to today’s problems. That doesn’t mean we can’t do better. We need to continue building a culture of accountability and respect. It’s easy to focus on yourself or perform for a small and noisy crowd, but success lies in reaching outwards and engaging meaningfully with people from right across the community, and that’s what our members, supporters and volunteers do every day. None of us would be here without their commitment, their passion—working tirelessly, giving their time, sharing their ideas and talking to real people to get more Greens elected.



To everyone who’s knocked on doors, made calls, stood at polling booths in the middle of winter, demanded change at rallies, shown solidarity at vigils and done so much more to make this country better, I want to thank each and every one of you. To all of my staff, who have worked so hard for so long this past decade, thanks so much for the long hours, the weekends, the travel away from home, the pep talks and the wise counsel—and just for listening to me whinge. I’m not going to name anyone today, but you know who you are, and I will be forever grateful.



To my team of wonderful Greens MPs: thank you for your unwavering support. You are all incredible human beings, and it has been a privilege to lead this incredible team. To Adam: you’re going to do us proud. To other MPs across the political divide: I know that most of you are here because you believe in making Australia a better place, and I genuinely wish all of you every success in making the next decade better than the last.



To all the people who keep our parliament functioning—the clerks, the Senate attendants, the cleaners and the gardeners—thank you so much. To the COMCAR drivers with whom I’ve spent many a long drive: just thanks for your company. It’s been a privilege.



And to my family: Lucy, thank you for your incredible support these past 10 years. I could not have done this without you, and I hope I can support you in your career, just as you have done in mine, as we raise two fine young boys. To my boys: time to get the footy boots out, because your old man’s back in town. To my mum and dad, who have ridden every bump along the way in support of their little boy: thank you for all of your love—and thanks, Mum, for all those packages of lasagne that I managed to sneak into Parliament House.



In my first speech almost a decade ago, fresh faced and optimistic, I quoted Martin Luther King, who said: ‘The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.’ Now older and greyer after a tough decade in parliament, my faith in that idea is a little shaken, but not broken. Sure, there’ve been setbacks this past decade, but it will bend towards justice again. It will bend because we will bend it together. Thank you so much.



 Source: The Australian Greens Website licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Australia Licence

President Trump a Strong promise to make America safer and stronger

-


President Trump We will make America prouder and we will make America greater than ever before. I am very, very proud to be the nominee of the Republican party. I love you all, God bless you and God bless America.

Donald J. Trump defines the American success story. Throughout his life, he has continually set the standards of business and entrepreneurial excellence, especially in real estate, sports, and entertainment. Mr. Trump built on his success in private life when he entered into politics and public service.  He remarkably won the Presidency in his first-ever run for any political office.

A graduate of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Finance, Mr. Trump followed in his father’s footsteps into the world of real estate development, making his mark in New York City. There, the Trump name soon became synonymous with the most prestigious of addresses in Manhattan and, subsequently, throughout the world


Mr. Trump is also an accomplished author. He has written more than fourteen bestsellers.  His first book, The Art of the Deal, is considered a business classic.

Mr. Trump announced his candidacy for the Presidency on June 16, 2015. He then accepted the Republican nomination for President of the United States in July of 2016, having defeated seventeen other contenders during the Republican primaries.

On November 8, 2016, Mr. Trump was elected President in the largest Electoral College landslide for a Republican in 28 years. Mr. Trump won more than 2,600 counties nationwide, the most since President Ronald Reagan in 1984. And he received the votes of more than 62 million Americans, the most ever for a Republican candidate. These voters, in delivering a truly national victory and historic moment, rallied behind Mr. Trump’s commitment to rebuilding our country and disrupting the political status quo that had failed to deliver results.

Mr. Trump won, in part, because he campaigned in places Republicans have had difficulty winning—Flint, Michigan, charter schools in inner-city Cleveland, and Hispanic churches in Florida.  He went there because he wanted to bring his message of economic empowerment to all Americans. Millions of new Republicans trusted Mr. Trump with their vote because of his commitment to delivering prosperity through a reformed tax code, an improved regulatory environment, and better trade deals. President Trump’s victory has brought Americans of all backgrounds together, and he is committed to delivering results for the Nation every day he serves in office.

President Trump has been married to his wife, Melania, for twelve years, and they are parents to their son, Barron. Mr. Trump also has four adult children, Don Jr., Ivanka, Eric, and Tiffany, as well as ten grandchildren.

Republican National Convention – Night 1: Land of Promise

-


Republican National Convention day 1: Land of Promise with Donald Trump Jr and other Speakers which include: Sen. Tim Scott House Republican Whip Steve Scalise Rep. Matt Gaetz Rep. Jim Jordan Nikki Haley

Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel Georgia state Rep. Vernon Jones Amy Johnson Ford Kimberly Guilfoyle Natalie Harp Charlie Kirk Kim Klacik Mark and Patricia McCloskey Sean Parnell Andrew Pollack Tanya Weinrei LIVE: Republican National Convention Night 1: Land of Promise with Donald Trump Jr. LIVE NOW: Republican National Convention Night 1: Land of Promise with Donald Trump Jr. LIVE STREAM: Republican National Convention Night 1: Land of Promise with Donald Trump Jr.

Melania Trump Movement: America’s Youth Celebrate 100 Years of Women’s Suffrage

-


First Lady Melania Trump is excited to announce Building the Movement: America’s Youth Celebrate 100 Years of Women’s Suffrage, an exhibit honouring the centennial anniversary of the ratification of the 19th amendment, which gave American women the right to vote. The exhibit will launch this August and will showcase artwork by young Americans depicting this historic milestone. To create this exhibit, the First Lady is asking students across the United States and its territories for submissions depicting individuals, objects, and events representing the women’s suffrage movement. Their artwork will appear alongside images of women’s suffrage parades, marches, and gatherings that took place at or around the White House.



As we celebrate the 100th Anniversary of the 19th Amendment, it’s important to include our children in the conversation so they can learn and understand the history behind the women’s suffrage movement,” said First Lady Melania Trump. “For decades, women leaders lobbied, marched, and protested for equality and their right to vote in the United States. It is my hope that this project will both support and expand the important conversations taking place on equality and the impact of peaceful protests while encouraging children to engage in the history behind this consequential movement in their own home state.”



The White House is encouraging submissions from students in grades 3-12, and will select one artwork to be included in the exhibit from each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, America Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. All applicants will receive a thank you note signed by the First Lady, thanking them for their participation in this special exhibit honouring the women’s suffrage movement.

To be considered, artwork must meet the following requirements:



  1. Two-dimensional, created on an 8”x 8” piece of paper. To submit, parents and guardians are asked to upload an image of your child’s artwork which can be a simple snapshot taken with a camera or a cell phone. Winners will be asked to send their original artwork via mail at a later date.
  2. Include a statement (up to 300 characters) about the artwork and how it represents women’s suffrage.
  3. Be based on one of the following categories: Suffragists, Suffrage Symbols, or Suffrage Events.



  • Suffragists: Portray a suffragist who inspires you. Many brave individuals dedicated themselves to fighting for women’s right to vote. Depict one of the well-known woman from the national movement or someone who did work in your state/territory.
  • Suffrage Symbols: Create your own button, ribbon, or sign. Activists and supporters wore buttons with messages such as “Votes for Women” or carried signs with statements to President Wilson: “Mr. President: How Long Must Women Wait for Liberty?”
  • Suffrage Events: Depict a historic march, protest, or other event related to the women’s suffrage movement. This can be a national happening or something from your state/territory.



To learn more about the women’s suffrage movement, please visit the Women’s Suffrage Centennial Commission website and review their state toolkits for more information on what happened in your state!



This exhibit is presented by the Office of the Curator in partnership with the Office of the First Lady.



Attribution: This article royalty-free license WhiteHouse.gov under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Palaszczuk LNP New Bradfield Scheme plan fails

-

The LNP have released plans for dams they’re not going to build and can’t pay for. Natural Resources Minister Dr Anthony Lynham said the LNP’s drawings marked ‘NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION’ proved the opposition had no plan.“As the Premier said today, the Palaszczuk Government has committed $1.2 billion to water infrastructure across this state since 2017, supporting almost 2300 jobs in regional Queensland,”

Dr Lynham said.“We will soon have to work for us a panel of experts to advise us on a 21st-century version of the Bradfield scheme that is feasible and affordable.“The only reason the LNP won’t say how they’ll pay for their promises is because they want to cut, sack and sell at a time when Queensland can afford it least.”Dr Lynham said that because Queensland was managing the health response, the state’s plan for economic recovery was already being delivered.“That means guaranteeing infrastructure delivery,” the Minister said.“The Palaszczuk Government is the only government building water infrastructure in Queensland.

”This includes:$176 million for Rookwood Weir.$410 million for the Haughton Pipeline Duplication Project (Stage 1 and 2) in Townsville and sealing a $24 million deal for the next stage of assessment for the proposed Hells Gates Dam.  $16.5 million for the Burdekin Falls Dam raising feasibility studies (which includes the detailed business case).$14.53 million for the planning works for the Burdekin Falls Dam improvement project.a $16.5 million contribution to modernising an existing open channel irrigation scheme on the Atherton Tablelands.$13.6 million to kick start the new Emu Swamp Dam.$1 million feasibility study into a Warwick pipeline.

“We are preserving the proposed Nullinga Dam site in Far North Queensland and pursuing alternative water supply options for the Far North,” he said.“We have made the proposed Urannah Dam a coordinated project and given the green light for the next stage of assessment as well as declaring the raising of the Burdekin Falls Dam Wall a coordinated project.””How about the LNP asks the Federal LNP to stump up the $176 million they’ve promised for Rookwood Weir in Central Queensland.“It’s time to meet their last set of dam election promises.” 

LNP drawings “Not for Construction”
Attribution: Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy
The Honourable Dr Anthony Lynham

Trump' US FDA announces emergency authorisation for convalescent plasma to treat Covid-19


President Trump in press Briefing James S. Brady Press Briefing Room: On the therapeutics front, this is what I’ve been looking to do for a long time.  This is a great thing.  Today, I’m pleased to make a truly historic announcement in our battle against the China virus that will save countless lives.  The FDA has issued an emergency use authorization — and that’s such a powerful term: emergency use authorization — for a treatment known as convalescent plasma.  This is a powerful therapy that transfuses very, very strong antibodies from the blood of recovered patients to help treat patients battling a current infection.  It’s had an incredible rate of success.







Today’s action will dramatically expand access to this treatment.  And I want to thank Dr. Hahn and Secretary Azar.  I want to thank the FDA — all of the people that have been working very hard on this.  It showed tremendous potential.





This is the only possible — and it’s only made possible because of Operation Warp Speed that has everybody working together.  We’re years ahead of approvals.  We would be — if we went by the speed levels of past administration, we’d be two years, three years behind where we are today, and that includes in vaccines that you’ll be hearing about very soon, very shortly.





To deliver treatments and vaccine to save lives, we’re removing unnecessary barriers and delays not by cutting corners, but by marshaling the full power of the federal government.





We’ve provided $48 million to fund the Mayo Clinic study that tested the efficacy of convalescent plasma for patients with the virus.  Through this study, over 100,000 Americans have already enrolled to receive this treatment, and it has proven to reduce mortality by 35 percent.  It’s a tremendous number.





The FDA, MIT, Harvard, and Mount Sinai hospital have also found convalescent plasma to be a very effective method of fighting this horrible disease.





Based on the science and the data, the FDA has made the independent determination that the treatment is safe and very effective.  Recently, we provided up to $270 million to the American Red Cross and America’s Blood Centers to support the collection of up to 360,000 units of plasma.





In late July, we launched a nationwide campaign to ask patients to have — who have recovered — and these are patients that have been incredible, the way they’ve donated — but these are people recovering from the virus — to donate plasma.  Since then, weekly plasma donations have doubled.





And today, I once again urge all Americans who have recovered from the virus to go to Coronavirus.gov and sign up and donate plasma today please.  It’s been really an incredible — just incredible people.  The country has united so strongly behind this.





And I’ll go over the numbers, but if you look at what’s happened and the success that we’ve had that people don’t talk about — the United States has experienced the lowest case-fatality rate of any major country in the world.  You don’t hear that.





The European Union’s case-fatality rate is estimated to be three times higher than that in the United States.  Europe has seen 33 percent more fatalities, compared to a typical non-pandemic year than the United States.





And I just want to ask two of our people that have done such a fantastic job, Alex Azar and Stephen Hahn, to say a few words.  And, Stephen, I want to thank you because the FDA really stepped up — and especially over the last few days — in getting this done.  The results have been incredible, and I think you’ll see the results even go up very substantially.  So we appreciate it.





And maybe I’ll ask Alex to go first, and then Stephen.  Thank you very much, Alex.





SECRETARY AZAR:  Well, thank you very much, Mr. President.  Thanks for the bold leadership that allowed us to deliver this very happy news today.





Thanks to your all-of-America approach, America has done more than any other country to expand the arsenal that we have to battle COVID-19.  And thanks to early efforts by your administration, Americans have broader access to these treatments, including convalescent plasma, than patients anywhere else in the world.





In early April, early in our fight against COVID-19, the FDA, BARDA, the Mayo Clinic, and other partners sprang into action to set up an expanded access protocol for this promising treatment.





President Trump is the Right to Try President, and he’s fought hard to ensure that Americans can have access to promising COVID-19 treatments.  Convalescent plasma has been a tried-and-true therapeutic method in prior outbreaks, but the President wanted to ensure that we develop the data to support its use, and this FDA authorization is one result of that effort.





The data we gathered suggests that patients who were treated early in their disease course — within three days of being diagnosed — with plasma containing high levels of antibodies benefited the most from treatment.  We saw about a 35 percent better survival in the patients who benefited most from the treatment — which were patients under 80 who were not on artificial respiration.





I just want to emphasize this point because I don’t want you to gloss over this — this number.  We dream, in drug development, of something like a 35 percent mortality reduction.  This is a major advance in the treatment of patients.  This is a major advance.





Convalescent plasma is one new tool that we’ve added to our arsenal against COVID-19, alongside remdesivir, steroids, and a number of other promising options currently being studied.  Because of the President’s Operation Warp Speed, we expect to have other new results and new options reaching patients as soon as this fall.





Operation Warp Speed is supporting experimental therapeutics all the way through to manufacturing so that if they meet FDA’s gold standard for safety and efficacy, they can begin reaching patients without a day wasted.





Americans who have tested positive for and recovered from COVID-19 can go to Coronavirus.gov to find out a quick, convenient way to play a potentially lifesaving role in our fight.  Know: If you donate plasma, you could save a life.





We’ve also provided guidance so healthcare providers can contact patients who have recovered from COVID-19 and give them information on how they can donate.





So, thank you again, Mr. President, for supporting this remarkable progress against COVID-19.  And I want to thank Dr. Hahn, Dr. Marks, and the entire team at the FDA for the speed with which they’ve approached this, the diligence to ensure that this meets the standards at FDA.





And I’ll turn it over to Dr. Hahn if that’s okay, Mr.  President.





THE PRESIDENT:  Good.  Thank you very much.





Please, Doctor.





DR. HAHN:  Thank you, Mr. President, for your leadership.  It’s good to be here today to announce FDA’s recent decision.  From the beginning of this pandemic, the President has asked FDA to cut back red tape to try to speed medical products into the hands of providers, patients, and American consumers.  And I just want to echo the President’s thanks to the more than 17,000 men and women who work at FDA.  They have worked day and night to, in fact, do that.





So, plasma is the liquid portion of the blood.  That liquid portion contains the natural immunity that someone develops in response to an infection — in this case, COVID-19 — and that liquid portion can be extracted.  And for many years, as the President and Secretary Azar said, it’s been given to patients with infectious diseases — for more than 100 years.  So there was a really good rationale for why this might work.





And, in fact, as was mentioned, in early April, an expanded-access program was started at the Mayo Clinic with the support of the federal government, under President Trump’s leadership, and that has gone on for the last four months.  More than 90,000, close to 100,000 Americans have enrolled in this program and over 70,000 have received treatment.  This is one of the largest expanded-access programs in the history of FDA.  So, a very successful approach to evaluating how convalescent plasma would work.





So, in the independent judgment of experts and expert scientists at FDA who have reviewed the totality of data — not just the data from this expanded-access program, but more than a dozen published studies, as well as the historical experience associated with this.  Those — those scientists have concluded that COVID-19 convalescent plasma is safe and shows promising efficacy, thereby meeting the criteria for an emergency use authorization.





In the optimal treatment — the optimal patients, as described by Secretary Azar, treated with convalescent plasma at the highest titers, there was a 35 percent improvement in survival, which is a significant clinical benefit.





Now, we’re waiting for more data.  We’re going to continue to gather data.  But this clearly meets the criteria that we’ve established for emergency use authorization, and we’re very pleased with these results.





So, let me just put this in perspective.  Many of you know I was a cancer doctor before I became FDA commissioner, and a 35 percent improvement in survival is a pretty substantial clinical benefit.  What that means is — and if the data continue to pan out — 100 people who are sick with COVID-19, 35 would have been saved because of the administration of plasma.





We’ve seen a great deal of demand for this from doctors around the country.  And what this EUA does — EUA — emergency use authorization today does: It allows us to continue that and meet the demand.





And again, I want to echo the President’s and the Secretary’s ask of the American people: If you’ve recovered from COVID-19, please donate.  It could save a life.





And, Mr. President, thank you again.





THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much, Stephen.  I appreciate it.





Okay, any questions, please?  Please, go ahead.





Q    Thank you, Mr. President.  I want to first ask you about the COVID-19 drugs that are in phase three.  Are they going to be available to the American population on — you and I talked previously about this idea of Right to Try.





THE PRESIDENT:  Right.





Q    Can we assure the American people that if it’s being studied and it’s in phase three, you have that right?





THE PRESIDENT:  You know, it’s a great question.  And I’m not sure a lot of people have been thinking about Right to Try.  We’re all waiting for the final answer.  And maybe I could ask Stephen, but I would say that Right to Try is exactly — if somebody is virtually terminal — in other words, they’re not going to make it — and if we have these incredible therapies and drugs that are happening, Alex, I think it’s a very interesting question.





I congratulate you for that question because I think —





Q    Thank you, Mr. President.





THE PRESIDENT:  — we’re all waiting for that exact final endpoint.





What about that, Stephen?  We have all of these great — seemingly great answers that are ready to come out, but because of the process, it takes — can we use some of this early, under Right to Try?  Please.





DR. HAHN:  So it’s a really good question.  And, of course, it all depends on the clinical circumstances and what a doctor and a patient together decide, with respect to the administration of any agent.





But if you think about what happened with convalescent plasma and the expanded-access program, this is exactly what happened.  This program — so, we have ongoing clinical trials that are randomized between placebo — or an inactive substance — and the convalescent plasma.  While that was going on, we knew that there was great demand from patients and doctors.  The expanded-access program is a way of actually doing that, and fits perfectly with what the President just said about allowing people to be able to use something that we have now determined to be very safe.