Home Blog Page 6

Hanson-Young: Labor Backs Trump’s Bombs but Deserts the Victims

Sammi Brown
-
0
Hanson-Young: Labor Backs Trump’s Bombs but Deserts the Victims

‘Sick, Obscene Politics’: Greens Slam Labor’s New Refugee Curbs Amid Middle East Conflict

CANBERRA – Senator Sarah Hanson-Young has launched a blistering attack on the Albanese government, accusing Labor of “slamming the door” on Middle Eastern refugees while simultaneously backing military escalation in the region.

Speaking in the Senate on Tuesday, the South Australian Senator condemned the government’s introduction of sweeping new powers designed to prevent those fleeing conflict in Iran and across the Middle East from seeking asylum in Australia.

A Study in Contrast

Hanson-Young highlighted what she termed “sheer hypocrisy,” noting that the restrictive measures arrived on the same day the Prime Minister offered protection to the Iranian women’s soccer team.

“On the very same day that the Prime Minister is offering protection to the Iranian women’s soccer team, this government is now slamming the door shut for anybody else,” Hanson-Young said. “What have we become?

Geopolitical Fallout

The Greens’ Manager of Business in the Senate further linked domestic migration policy to Australia’s foreign alignment, accusing the government of backing a “bloody war” led by the Trump administration while deserting the victims of that same violence.

The Senator argued that Labor is currently “locked in a race to the bottom” with the Liberal Party and One Nation, describing the legislative rush as “sick, obscene politics.”

Humanitarian Crisis

The remarks come amid reports of intensifying violence in the Middle East, with schools and hospitals being destroyed. Hanson-Young argued that the government was “cheering on” the bombing while denying safety to those displaced by it.

“War kills people. Wars create refugees,” Hanson-Young concluded, labeling the government’s actions as “disgusting.”

The government has yet to formally respond to the Senator’s characterization of the new powers, which the Greens claim represent a fundamental abandonment of Australia’s humanitarian obligations.






                

            


        

            

            

                

                    
                        Labor Government Slugs Motorists 73 Cents in Tax per Litre as Global Oil Crisis Cripples Supply                    
                


                

                    

                    

                        Sammi Brown
                        
 - 

                    


                    
                        
                    

                    

                        
                            
                            0                        
                    

                


                                    

                        
                        
                            Labor Government Slugs Motorists 73 Cents in Tax per Litre as Global Oil Crisis Cripples Supply
                        
                    

                
                

                    

“The Hormuz Halt”: Australian Fuel Prices Skyrocket as Middle East Conflict Closes Vital Strait





SYDNEY / CANBERRA — Australian motorists are facing a “brutal” week at the bowser as global oil prices surged past US$114 per barrel following the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. The crisis has reignited fierce debate over Australia’s fuel security, with the nation currently holding only 34 to 36 days of petrol and diesel reserves.





The “Strait” of Emergency





The crisis hit a breaking point on March 2, 2026, when Iranian officials confirmed the closure of the Strait of Hormuz—the world’s most critical energy chokepoint.





For Australia, the impact is structural. While the conflict is far away, 90% of Australia’s refined fuel is imported, largely from Singaporean and South Korean refineries that rely almost exclusively on Middle Eastern crude moving through that single waterway.





Chaos at the Bowser





In Australia’s major cities, the “fuel price cycle” has been upended. Typically, prices fluctuate in a predictable wave, but motoring groups warn that retailers are using the international crisis to “jack up margins” prematurely.





CityAverage Price (91 RON)Status
Sydney$2.23Extreme High
Melbourne$2.19Extreme High
Brisbane$2.18Extreme High
Perth$1.89Rising
Adelaide$1.85Rising





NRMA spokesman Peter Khoury described the $2.20+ prices in Sydney and Melbourne as “unjustifiable,” noting that the international price spike usually takes 7–10 days to reach Australian pumps. “Oil companies are using the Middle East crisis as an excuse to rip off the community while they’re already doing it tough with cost-of-living pressures,” Mr. Khoury said.





Federal Government Response





Prime Minister Anthony Albanese addressed the nation this morning, announcing a defensive military deployment to the Gulf.





Diesel Priority: Energy Minister Chris Bowen urged calm, specifically addressing farmers and the transport industry. While demand has spiked, he insisted that “every scheduled arrival of diesel has landed,” and there is currently no need for panic buying.





Military Aid: Australia is deploying an E-7A Wedgetail surveillance aircraft and advanced air-to-air missiles to the UAE to help secure regional airspace.





ACCC Warning: Treasurer Jim Chalmers has formally instructed the ACCC to “name and shame” any retailers found price-gouging beyond the legitimate increase in wholesale costs.





The “36-Day” Warning





The crisis has exposed Australia’s thin fuel buffer. Unlike many G7 nations that hold 90 days of supply, Australia’s strategic reserve remains “non-compliant” with international standards.







“This isn’t a distant geopolitical drama; it’s a direct threat to our supermarket shelves and emergency services,” warned Jake Field, National Secretary of the Maritime Union of Australia.







As of March 10, 2026, the RBA has warned that if oil remains above US$110, another interest rate hike remains a “live” possibility to combat the resulting inflationary spike.

                

            


        

            

            

                

                    
                         Bitcoin! Start Seizing the Discount: How $20 a Week Builds a Fortune in a Bear Market                    
                


                

                    

                    

                        Sammi Brown
                        
 - 

                    


                    
                        
                    

                    

                        
                            
                            0                        
                    

                


                                    

                        
                        
                             Bitcoin! Start Seizing the Discount: How $20 a Week Builds a Fortune in a Bear Market
                        
                    

                
                

                    

The Birth of a Mantra





The term “Stacking Sats” refers to the practice of accumulating the smallest unit of Bitcoin—the Satoshi (named after the anonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto). There are 100,000,000 sats in a single Bitcoin.





The movement gained its wings around 2017 and 2018, popularised by Bitcoiners like podcaster Matt Odell and championed by figures like Jack Dorsey. It was a psychological pivot: if you couldn’t afford 1 BTC, you could certainly afford 10,000 sats. It turned Bitcoin from a “rich man’s gamble” into a “working man’s savings account.”





The “Stay Humble, Stack Sats” Philosophy





The phrase evolved into a full-blown lifestyle: “Stay Humble, Stack Sats.” This wasn’t just a financial tip; it was a rebuttal to the “Lambo” culture of 2017.





Stack Sats: Every spare dollar, every cashback reward, and every bit of “fiat” (government currency) earned from a job should be slowly converted into Bitcoin.





Stay Humble: Don’t brag about your gains, don’t try to time the market, and don’t get distracted by “get-rich-quick” altcoins.





The Strategy: “Mining Fiat”





The true “Stacker” views their day job as a way to “mine fiat”—the process of working a traditional job specifically to trade that depreciating cash for “hard money” (Bitcoin). They use a strategy called Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA):





    

  1. Automate: Set an app to buy $10, $20, or $50 of Bitcoin every week or month.
    2. 




  2. Ignore the Price: If the price is up, you buy. If the price crashes, you buy more sats for the same dollar.
    3. 




  3. Low Time Preference: Stackers don’t care about the price today. They are looking 10, 20, or 30 years into the future.
    4. 






The Math of the Stack





To a stacker, the units look different. While the world sees Bitcoin at $60,000, the stacker sees: | USD Amount | Satoshis (approx.) | | :— | :— | | $1 | ~1,600 sats | | $10 | ~16,000 sats | | $100 | ~160,000 sats |





Note: Figures based on a theoretical price of $62,500 per BTC.





The Movement Today





What started as a niche Twitter hashtag has become a global financial ritual. There are now apps dedicated solely to “rounding up” your coffee purchases into sats, and “Stacking Saturdays” where the community shares screenshots of their recurring buys.





The story of “Stacking Sats” is ultimately one of patience. It is the digital version of the “penny saved, penny earned” mantra. In a world of instant gratification and volatile markets, the Stacker is the person who realises that a mountain is just a very large pile of very small stones—and they are perfectly happy adding one stone at a time.





This is the command center of someone who has embraced the “Stay Humble, Stack Sats” philosophy. You can see the blend of low-time preference financial discipline and a love for the technology:





    

  • The Hardware Wallet: The crucial Coldcard, the vault where the accumulated sats are secured, completely separate from the internet.
    • 




  • The Full Node: Running on a Raspberry Pi, this allows the stacker to verify their own transactions rather than trusting someone else.
    • 




  • The Stacker’s Reminders: A hand-written note on a sticky (“Stay Humble, Stack Sats”) and a classic Casio watch, symbolizing the patience of “DCA” (Dollar-Cost Averaging).
    • 




  • The Stack Itself: A physical “Stack of Sats” token, a reminder that every small unit adds up.
    • 






Now, let’s look at the numbers.





You asked for a calculation. If you were to start “Mining Fiat” (working your job) and dedicating a set amount each week, here is what your “Stack” might look like after just one year.





(For these calculations, we will use a hypothetical average Bitcoin price of $65,000 USD over the year.)





Weekly “Stack” AmountTotal Annual USD InvestmentTotal Satoshis Accumulated (Approx.)Total BTC (Approx.)
$21$1,0921,680,000 sats0.0168 BTC
$50$2,6004,000,000 sats0.0400 BTC
$100$5,2008,000,000 sats0.0800 BTC
$250$13,00020,000,000 sats0.2000 BTC





The Math of DCA: The power of “Stacking Sats” isn’t just the accumulation; it’s the averaging. When Bitcoin’s price drops by 20% in a week, your fixed weekly investment automatically buys 20% more satoshis, ensuring you are building your stack faster during market downturns without any emotional decision-making





Get started on Australia’s most trusted exchange, CoinSpot. Sign up via the link and score $10 in Bitcoin for free






                

            


        

            

            

                

                    
                        Senator Payman Warns: NDIS Fraud Hunt Must Not Become a “Muslim Profiling” Exercise                    
                


                

                    

                    

                        Sammi Brown
                        
 - 

                    


                    
                        
                    

                    

                        
                            
                            0                        
                    

                


                                    

                        
                        
                            Senator Payman Warns: NDIS Fraud Hunt Must Not Become a “Muslim Profiling” Exercise
                        
                    

                
                

                    

The bustling streets of Western Sydney are usually filled with the aroma of charcoal chicken and the rhythmic hum of community life. But lately, a new, colder frequency has tuned in: a sense of “unjust suspicion.”





For families relying on the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), the program is a lifeline—the difference between isolation and integration. However, as the federal government ramps up its crackdown on NDIS fraud, a shadow has fallen over specific suburbs. Senator Fatima Payman has stepped into this fray, sounding a sharp alarm: the dragnet designed to catch criminals risks ensnaring the dignity of Muslim Australians.





The Integrity Dilemma





The NDIS is currently weathering a storm of exploitation. From providers billing for “ghost” services to the coercion of vulnerable participants, the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) is in a race to recover millions. While the need to safeguard the scheme’s sustainability is undisputed, the rhetoric surrounding the cleanup has taken a troubling turn.





On social media and in political discourse, a narrative has emerged that links systemic fraud to specific cultural enclaves. Senator Payman’s intervention highlights a painful reality: when “enhanced scrutiny” is applied through the lens of prejudice, it ceases to be about justice and becomes about profiling.





Gemini said





The bustling streets of Western Sydney are usually filled with the aroma of charcoal chicken and the rhythmic hum of community life. But lately, a new, colder frequency has tuned in: a sense of “unjust suspicion.”





For families relying on the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), the program is a lifeline—the difference between isolation and integration. However, as the federal government ramps up its crackdown on NDIS fraud, a shadow has fallen over specific suburbs. Senator Fatima Payman has stepped into this fray, sounding a sharp alarm: the dragnet designed to catch criminals risks ensnaring the dignity of Muslim Australians.





The Integrity Dilemma





The NDIS is currently weathering a storm of exploitation. From providers billing for “ghost” services to the coercion of vulnerable participants, the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) is in a race to recover millions. While the need to safeguard the scheme’s sustainability is undisputed, the rhetoric surrounding the cleanup has taken a troubling turn.





On social media and in political discourse, a narrative has emerged that links systemic fraud to specific cultural enclaves. Senator Payman’s intervention highlights a painful reality: when “enhanced scrutiny” is applied through the lens of prejudice, it ceases to be about justice and becomes about profiling.





The Human Cost of Stigma





The risk isn’t just bureaucratic; it’s social. When a community is signaled out as a “hotbed” for misuse, innocent families face a double burden. They must navigate the complexities of living with a disability while simultaneously defending their right to support against a backdrop of cultural suspicion.







“The methods employed must ensure fairness and avoid stigmatizing any community,” Payman warned, reminding authorities that a crackdown is only successful if it protects the vulnerable—all of them.







A Path Forward





The challenge for the NDIA is to strengthen identity and authority verification without turning the process into a gauntlet for marginalised groups. Balancing the books cannot come at the cost of social cohesion. As the government moves forward, the focus must remain on the deed, not the postcode or the creed.





The integrity of the NDIS is measured not just by the dollars saved, but by the equity of its application.





To address the concerns raised by Senator Payman and ensure the NDIS remains equitable, the Australian Government has introduced two major tranches of legislation. These reforms aim to move away from broad community scrutiny toward specific, data-driven “bad actor” targeting.





Here are the key oversight and accountability mechanisms being implemented:





1. The “Getting the NDIS Back on Track” Act 2024





This first major reform (which commenced in October 2024) shifts the focus from individual “functional impairments” to a more holistic “support needs assessment.”





    

  • New Framework Planning: Starting in mid-2026, budgets will be set through a “person-centered” assessment process. This aims to reduce the subjectivity in planning that often leads to inconsistent funding and subsequent suspicion of fraud.
    • 




  • Mandatory Electronic Claiming: The NDIA is transitioning to a fully electronic system to provide real-time visibility into who is being paid, reducing the “ghosting” of services without targeting specific postcodes.
    • 






2. The Integrity and Safeguarding Bill 2025





Introduced in November 2025, this second tranche of reform significantly increases the penalties for those exploiting the scheme while adding oversight layers.





    

  • Aggravated Contraventions: New civil and criminal penalties (including fines exceeding $16 million and jail time) target “systemic patterns of conduct” rather than individual errors.
    • 




  • Banning Orders for Consultants: For the first time, banning powers extend to auditors and consultants—not just direct care providers—to root out the professional enablers of fraud.
    • 




  • 90-Day Cooling-Off Period: A new safety net allows participants to withdraw from a provider without penalty within 90 days, giving families more power to escape coercive or fraudulent arrangements.
    • 






3. The Fraud Fusion Taskforce & “Risk-Proportionate” Regulation





To address the risk of community profiling, the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission is moving toward a Risk-Proportionate Regulation model.





    

  • Data Matching: Instead of relying on geographic “hotspots,” the multi-agency Fraud Fusion Taskforce uses data matching between the ATO, NDIA, and Federal Police to identify financial anomalies.
    • 




  • Independent Review Mechanism: The 2024 Act mandates an independent review of all new measures within five years to ensure they are being applied equitably and are not causing “disproportionate compliance burdens” on specific groups.
    • 


                

            


        

            

            

                

                    
                        Douglas Macgregor (clip): Iran Threatens All-Out Retaliation – No Limits                    
                


                

                    

                    

                        Sammi Brown
                        
 - 

                    


                    
                        
                    

                    

                        
                            
                            0                        
                    

                


                                    

                        
                        
                            Douglas Macgregor (clip): Iran Threatens All-Out Retaliation – No Limits
                        
                    

                
                

                    

Douglas Macgregor is a retired Colonel, combat veteran and former senior advisor to the U.S. Secretary of Defence. Col. Macgregor discusses why a decision has likely been made to attack Iran, and why Iran will fight with everything it has, as this is a war for survival





Macgregor’s Modern Views on Iran





If you are looking for his recent “narratives” on a potential Iran war, he frequently describes a “doom” scenario in interviews and articles (such as in The American Conservative or Foreign Policy). His current “story” of a war with Iran generally follows these beats:





    

  • Inevitability of Failure: He argues that a conventional ground war with Iran would be a “disaster” for the U.S., potentially leading to the destruction of American naval power in the Persian Gulf.
    • 




  • Regional Escalation: He predicts that any strike on Iran would immediately pull in Russia and China, effectively starting World War III.
    • 




  • Economic Collapse: He often emphasises that such a war would close the Strait of Hormuz, causing a global economic depression.
    • 







https://youtu.be/xygDiolrlM4?si=LxuCLvr50R-jr7Ti






THIS WAR COULD CRASH AMERICA | Col. Douglas Macgregor

                

            


        

            

            

                

                    
                        Siphoned and Sabotaged: How Organized Crime “Rorted” the NDIS                    
                


                

                    

                    

                        Sammi Brown
                        
 - 

                    


                    
                        
                    

                    

                        
                            
                            0                        
                    

                


                                    

                        
                        
                            Siphoned and Sabotaged: How Organized Crime “Rorted” the NDIS
                        
                    

                
                

                    

SYDNEY – The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), once hailed as a world-leading social reform, is currently facing its most significant existential crisis. Recent investigations by the Fraud Fusion Taskforce (FFT) have pulled back the curtain on a sophisticated “get-rich-quick” culture fueled by organised crime syndicates that have systematically siphoned billions of dollars away from Australia’s most vulnerable citizens.





The Scale of the “Rort”





The latest data from 2026 reveals a staggering level of exploitation. According to recent reports, over $1 billion in NDIS payments have been under investigation in the last year alone. Authorities have identified a “shadow industry” where organised crime groups operate as registered providers to facilitate large-scale money laundering and fraud.





In one landmark case in January 2026, a 31-year-old provider director from Sydney was charged with allegedly laundering $3.5 million in NDIS funds. Investigators found that the money was siphoned through “ghost billing”—claiming for services and supports that were never actually delivered to participants.





How Organized Crime Corrupted the Industry





Law enforcement agencies, including the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC), have identified three primary methods used by criminal syndicates to infiltrate the sector:





    

  1. “Ghosting” and Overclaiming: Syndicates set up legitimate-looking front companies to bill the NDIA for intensive 24/7 care while actually providing minimal or zero support.
    2. 




  2. Coercion and Kickbacks: Criminal actors have been found targeting NDIS participants in low-socioeconomic areas, offering them small cash “rebates” or gifts in exchange for access to their NDIS plan details.
    3. 




  3. The “Phoenix” Strategy: When a provider is flagged for suspicious activity, the operators “phoenix” the company—shutting it down and reopening under a new name and a different “clean” director to continue the fraud.
    4. 








“We are no longer just dealing with ‘dodgy’ providers; we are fighting organized syndicates that view the NDIS as an ATM,” a taskforce official stated. “Where we see fraud, we often see a trail of neglect and abuse of the very people the scheme was built to protect.”







Government Response: The “Integrity” Crackdown





In response to the mounting crisis, the Australian Government has introduced the NDIS Amendment (Integrity and Safeguarding) Bill. This legislation represents the most aggressive regulatory shift in the scheme’s history:





    

  • Massive Fines: Maximum penalties for serious contraventions have been hiked from $400,000 to over $16 million.
    • 




  • Criminal Charges: For the first time, “bad actors” face significant jail time for serious breaches of registration and banning orders.
    • 




  • Electronic Claiming: A move toward a fully electronic, real-time claiming system to prevent the manual “doctoring” of invoices.
    • 




  • Banning Orders: The NDIS Commission now has expanded powers to ban not just providers, but also the consultants and auditors who help them hide their tracks.
    • 






The Human Cost





While the government focuses on the “bottom line,” disability advocates warn that the corruption has left a trail of human wreckage. Participants report being “ghosted” by providers who have already emptied their annual budgets, leaving them without essential therapy, equipment, or daily care.





“The money is one thing,” says one Melbourne-based advocate. “But the loss of trust is the real tragedy. People with disabilities now have to wonder if their carer is there to help them or to harvest their data for a syndicate.”

                

            


        

            

            

                

                    
                        One Nation Polls Past Coalition at 27-28% – Promises Mass Migration Caps, $90B Savings, Cheaper Power                    
                


                

                    

                    

                        Sammi Brown
                        
 - 

                    


                    
                        
                    

                    

                        
                            
                            0                        
                    

                


                                    

                        
                        
                            One Nation Polls Past Coalition at 27-28% – Promises Mass Migration Caps, $90B Savings, Cheaper Power
                        
                    

                
                

                    

The dramatic shift in Australian federal polling has intensified, with Pauline Hanson’s One Nation party surging past the Liberal-National Coalition in key surveys conducted in late February 2026. Recent polls indicate One Nation capturing 27-28% of the primary vote, overtaking the Coalition’s faltering 19-20%, while the governing Labor Party holds steady at around 32%.In the latest Newspoll (conducted February 23-26, sample of 1,237), Labor sits on 32% primary support (down 1 point), One Nation remains strong at 27%, the Coalition rises slightly to 20% (up 2 points), and the Greens drop to 11%. A separate RedBridge Group poll (reported around the same period, sample of 1,006) shows Labor at 32% (down 2 points from the previous month), One Nation climbing to 28% (up 2), and the Coalition unchanged at 19%.





These figures mark a historic milestone for One Nation, which has rapidly ascended from fringe status post the May 2025 federal election to a clear second-place contender nationally. The party now consistently polls ahead of the Coalition on primary votes in multiple trackers, reflecting deep disillusionment among conservative voters.Regional divides are particularly stark. In rural and regional areas, One Nation demonstrates commanding strength, leading Labor 53-46 on two-party preferred (TPP) measures in some breakdowns. This urban-rural split underscores growing frustration in non-metropolitan electorates over issues like cost-of-living pressures, economic management, and perceived neglect by major parties.





Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s personal ratings have taken a hit, with approval dipping to 40% amid ongoing economic challenges. In the Newspoll, his preferred prime minister lead narrows, while in the RedBridge survey, a three-way contest places Albanese at 34%, Pauline Hanson at 23%, and new Opposition Leader Angus Taylor at 10%.The Coalition, under Taylor—who assumed leadership in mid-February following internal upheaval—has yet to see a significant bounce. While Taylor’s personal approval (35%) improves on his predecessor’s, the party’s primary vote languishes at record lows in some polls. Taylor has signaled openness to preference arrangements with One Nation in select contests, such as upcoming by-elections, stating he would “show respect” to One Nation voters and declining to rule out directing preferences their way in certain scenarios. This pragmatic stance contrasts with historical Coalition reluctance but reflects the urgency of stemming the right-wing vote bleed.





Voter sentiment echoes broader discontent. As one 72-year-old regional voter, Hawford, expressed in interviews tied to the polling wave, many feel Labor “no longer represents them” amid soaring living costs, housing pressures, and other grievances. Analysts attribute One Nation’s rise to a potent mix of economic hardship, cultural concerns, and protest voting against the major parties.Labor maintains solid TPP leads—54-46 over One Nation and 53-47 over the Coalition in respondent-allocated preferences from the RedBridge poll—suggesting the government’s path to re-election remains viable if current trends hold. However, the fragmentation on the right poses risks, potentially complicating preference flows and seat outcomes in a future election, due by 2028.The polls highlight a volatile political landscape, with One Nation’s momentum challenging traditional assumptions about Australia’s two-party dominance. As debates over economic policy, immigration, and national identity intensify, all parties face pressure to respond to this shifting electorate.





Pauline Hanson’s One Nation is a right-wing populist party in Australia, emphasising “Australia first” principles, economic nationalism, traditional values, and opposition to what it sees as excessive government intervention, globalism, and progressive policies. Its key policies, drawn from the party’s official website (onenation.org.au) and recent reporting as of early 2026, focus on cost-of-living relief, immigration control, energy realism, fiscal conservatism, and cultural/national sovereignty issues. Here are the main ones:





Immigration and Border Security: One Nation advocates for a major reduction in immigration levels to ease pressure on housing, infrastructure, wages, and services.





    

  • Cap permanent visas at around 130,000 per year (a sharp cut from current levels under Labor).
    • 




  • Deport illegal migrants (targeting tens of thousands).
    • 




  • Introduce an eight-year waiting period for citizenship and access to welfare benefits.
    • 




  • Reintroduce Temporary Protection Visas to prevent permanent residency pathways for certain arrivals.
    • 




  • Refuse entry from countries seen as fostering “extremist ideologies” incompatible with Australian values.
    • 




  • Stronger border enforcement and opposition to loopholes in the system.
    • 






This area remains a core driver of the party’s appeal, particularly in regional areas facing housing and service strains.





Economy, Tax, and Cost of LivingThe party prioritizes measures to reduce living costs and government overreach.





    

  • Joint income tax filing for couples with at least one dependent child — allowing combined income to be split equally for tax purposes, providing significant relief for families.
    • 




  • A $90 billion budget savings plan to slash “wasteful” government spending, streamline bureaucracy, and redirect funds to benefit everyday Australians.
    • 




  • Halve the fuel excise (previously highlighted as a policy copied by others).
    • 




  • Protectionist elements: Review and potentially revoke free trade agreements not in Australia’s interest, reintroduce tariffs where needed, oppose foreign ownership of agricultural land and key assets, and prioritize Australian jobs and industries.
    • 






Energy and Climate PolicyOne Nation rejects much of the current climate agenda.





    

  • Scrap net zero emissions targets, viewed as leading to higher costs and government control.
    • 




  • Build more coal-fired power stations and support nuclear energy (e.g., commission reactors in regional areas).
    • 




  • Abolish the Renewable Energy Target, shut down the Department of Climate Change, and withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement.
    • 




  • Oppose subsidies for foreign-owned solar and wind projects, and ban or restrict offshore wind farms.
    • 




  • Prioritise affordable, reliable energy from Australia’s natural resources for domestic benefit.
    • 






Other Key Areas





    

  • Free Speech: Enshrine free speech protections in the Constitution to prevent censorship and government overreach.
    • 




  • Water and Infrastructure: Build new dams and water projects to support farmers and regional growth.
    • 




  • Housing: Reduce demand pressures (via lower immigration) and other measures like GST moratoriums on building materials to improve affordability.
    • 




  • Social/Cultural Issues: Oppose “gender ideology” in schools, support biological definitions (e.g., standing up for biological women), pro-life positions (reduce late-term abortion limits, ban sex-selective abortions, add safeguards/counselling), and resist Indigenous treaties or related initiatives.
    • 




  • Governance: Push for citizen-initiated referenda, review politician salaries/pensions, and protect national sovereignty against multinational or foreign influence.
    • 






One Nation positions itself as the party representing “forgotten” Australians — especially in regional and outer-metropolitan areas — frustrated by major parties on issues like economic hardship, cultural change, and perceived elite priorities

                

            


        

            

            

                

                    
                        Trump Unleashes “Operation Roaring Lion”: Major U.S. Combat Operations Begin in Iran                    
                


                

                    

                    

                        Sammi Brown
                        
 - 

                    


                    
                        
                    

                    

                        
                            
                            0                        
                    

                


                                    

                        
                        
                            Trump Unleashes “Operation Roaring Lion”: Major U.S. Combat Operations Begin in Iran
                        
                    

                
                

                    

The Strike: Operation Roaring Lion





The joint U.S.-Israeli mission, codenamed Operation Roaring Lion, shattered the morning calm across several Iranian cities. Unlike the nighttime precision strikes of previous years, this was a bold, daylight offensive designed to maximise the element of surprise. Explosions were reported in Tehran, Isfahan, and Karaj, with plumes of thick black smoke rising near the downtown offices of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei





In a video statement posted to Truth Social, President Trump framed the intervention as a necessary preemptive measure.













“Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime,” Trump declared, citing intelligence that Tehran was moving toward long-range missile capabilities capable of reaching the U.S. mainland





A Region on the Brink





The scale of the attack appears to be the most significant U.S. military intervention in the Middle East since 2003. Reports indicate that dozens of strike aircraft, launched from carriers in the Arabian Sea and regional bases, targeted Iranian military infrastructure and symbols of government authority.





The Humanitarian and Political Stakes





While the White House maintains the strikes are focused on military targets, the humanitarian situation in Tehran remains fluid. With mobile services restricted and roads to government compounds blocked, the civilian population faces an uncertain night. President Trump directly addressed the Iranian people in his broadcast, stating, “The hour of your freedom is at hand,” and calling on them to take over their government.





Fighter jets flying over city explosion





Military Assets and Strategy





The joint U.S.-Israeli offensive, officially named Operation Lion’s Roar (or Operation Roaring Lion), is a multi-domain assault designed to dismantle Iran’s strategic capabilities.





Aerial Dominance: Dozens of U.S. and Israeli strike aircraft—including F-35I Adir stealth fighters and B-52 bombers—have been reported over Iranian airspace. The U.S. Navy has deployed a “vast fleet,” including the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group, to launch cruise missiles and facilitate round-the-clock sorties.





Target Profile: Intelligence officials confirm the strikes are focused on nuclear enrichment sites (such as Fordow and Isfahan), ballistic missile production facilities, and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) command-and-control centers.





Cyber & Electronic Warfare: Simultaneous with the physical strikes, Iran experienced widespread mobile service outages and the shutdown of its domestic intranet, likely a coordinated effort to paralyse the regime’s ability to organise a counter-response.







ONGOING Live Stream of war below












                

            


        

            

            

                

                    
                        We Are All Australians”: Hanson Defends National Cohesion Against Divisive Rituals at Royal Commission                    
                


                

                    

                    

                        Sammi Brown
                        
 - 

                    


                    
                        
                    

                    

                        
                            
                            0                        
                    

                


                                    

                        
                        
                            We Are All Australians”: Hanson Defends National Cohesion Against Divisive Rituals at Royal Commission
                        
                    

                
                

                    

In the past seven days, Senator Pauline Hanson and One Nation have dominated headlines following the first public hearing of the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion.







The Senator’s recent commentary has sparked a fierce national debate, centering on the role of cultural ceremonies and the specific focus of the inquiry following the December 14 terror attack at Bondi Beach.







The Senator’s recent commentary has sparked a fierce national debate, centering on the role of cultural ceremonies and the specific focus of the inquiry following the December 14 terror attack at Bondi Beach.





1. Backlash Against “Uncle Allan” and the Welcome to Country





On February 24, 2026, Senator Hanson took to X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook to vent her frustration over the Royal Commission’s opening. She specifically targeted the “Welcome to Country” delivered by Indigenous leader Allan Murray (Uncle Allan).





Hanson argued that the ceremony, which touched on “stolen land” and “tall ships,” was a “divisive” distraction.





    

  • The Conflict: Hanson questioned why a commission established to investigate a “radical Islamic terrorist attack” was beginning with Indigenous politics.
    • 




  • The Reaction: She expressed particular outrage that the Commissioner, former High Court Justice Virginia Bell, thanked Uncle Allan for a “warm and inclusive” welcome. Hanson labeled the exchange “a joke.”
    • 






2. “One Flag, One People” – The National Unity Push





Following the hearing, Hanson doubled down on her long-standing policy to scrap “Welcome to Country” and “Acknowledgement of Country” ceremonies from all public sectors.





The Argument: She claims these ceremonies have become “performative” and are now forced into everything from corporate Zoom calls to airline landings, ultimately creating a “racial divide” rather than fostering cohesion.





One Nation Platform: The official One Nation website and Hanson’s social media feeds have been saturated with the message that Australia must “unite under one national flag.”





3. Fallout from Muslim Community Comments





The week has also been marked by intense political heat regarding Hanson’s recent interviews on Sky News and ABC.





    

  • The Controversy: Hanson’s questioning of whether there are “good Muslims” and her claims that certain Sydney suburbs like Lakemba make people feel “unwanted” have led to calls for legal action.
    • 




  • Government Response: The Australian Federal Police (AFP) confirmed they received “reports of a crime” regarding these remarks. Meanwhile, NSW Premier Chris Minns and various Coalition figures, including Matt Canavan and Tim Wilson, have publicly distanced themselves, with some calling her “unfit to lead.”
    • 






4. Surging Polls and “A Super Progressive Movie”





Despite—or perhaps because of—the drama, One Nation’s popularity appears to be rising.





    

  • Guardian Essential Poll: A poll released this week shows more than half of Australians are open to voting for One Nation.
    • 




  • Cultural Content: The party is capitalizing on this momentum by promoting their feature-length animated production, A Super Progressive Movie, which mocks what they call “the Naarm bubble” and “identity politics.”
    • 






DateEventKey Quote/Outcome
Feb 24Royal Commission Hearing“A divisive Welcome to Country was the first thing… heard.”
Feb 25Essential Poll Results58% of voters “open” to voting One Nation.
Feb 26AFP InvestigationReports of a crime received regarding anti-Muslim remarks.
Feb 27Farrer PreselectionParty focuses on regional by-elections amidst the national storm.














Sources: One Nation , Sammi Brown, X, Gemini 3

                

            


        

            

            

                

                    
                        “Adult Time for Violent Crime”: Victoria Launches Massive Crackdown on Youth Offenders and Gang Leaders                    
                


                

                    

                    

                        Sammi Brown
                        
 - 

                    


                    
                        
                    

                    

                        
                            
                            0                        
                    

                


                                    

                        
                        
                            “Adult Time for Violent Crime”: Victoria Launches Massive Crackdown on Youth Offenders and Gang Leaders
                        
                    

                
                

                    

VICTORIA: In a major shift for the state’s justice system, the Allan Labor Government has officially enacted the “Adult Time for Violent Crime” laws, fundamentally changing how the legal system handles serious youth offenders. Effective immediately, any individual aged 14 or older who commits a violent home invasion or carjacking will be sentenced as an adult, facing significantly harsher penalties in adult courts.





Increased Penalties and Community Safety





The new legislation marks a departure from previous sentencing limits. While the Children’s Court is capped at imposing a maximum jail sentence of three years for any offence, the County Court now has the authority to hand down sentences of up to 25 years for aggravated home invasion and carjacking.





Premier Jacinta Allan emphasised that the shift focuses on the gravity of the crime rather than the age of the perpetrator. “Under Adult Time for Violent Crime, the chance of jail is stronger, and sentences are longer,” Premier Allan stated. “We absolutely need serious consequences for violent youth crime to protect the community now.”





By moving these cases to adult courts, the legal process will place a higher premium on victim impact and community safety. Statistics provided by the government indicate that when youth offenders are sentenced in adult courts for violent crimes, the vast majority receive custodial sentences.










Fighting Gang Recruitment and Grooming





Recognising that enforcement is only one side of the coin, the government simultaneously announced a massive expansion of early intervention programs through the Violence Reduction Unit (VRU). A new $1 million anti-gang initiative, delivered by Think Village, will launch across the state to protect teenagers from being groomed into organised crime.





The program is designed to help families and educators identify the subtle signs of gang recruitment, particularly on social media, encrypted messaging apps, and gaming platforms.





“The VRU is protecting kids from organised crime gangs, and police are working to catch the evil ringleaders,” said Minister for Police Anthony Carbines. The unit utilizes evidence-based strategies that have seen significant success internationally, including:





    

  • A 48% drop in violent crime in Scotland.
    • 




  • A 28% decrease in knife crime injuries among young people in London.
    • 






The “Think Village” Approach





Think Village will deliver community workshops designed with local leaders to build a “support ecosystem” around at-risk youth. Joint CEOs Hanad Hersi and Mahamed Ahmed noted that the program is specialised to address the modern ways young people are drawn into violence—methods that often fly under the radar of adults.





Attorney-General Sonya Kilkenny highlighted the dual-track strategy of the Labor government, contrasting it with opposition calls to cancel the VRU. “Our plan delivers both serious consequences and early interventions,” Kilkenny said. “These crime ringleaders deserve to face a life sentence, and the kids they prey on need help. We’ll deliver both.”





With the “Adult Time” laws now in effect and the VRU rolling out its digital and community campaigns, Victoria enters a new era of crime prevention aimed at breaking the cycle of violence before it starts while ensuring those who commit serious harm face the full weight of the law.














Court TypeMax Sentence (General)Target Focus
Children’s Court3 YearsRehabilitation-heavy
County Court (Adult)25 Years / LifeVictim & Community Safety





Source: State Government of Victoria






                

            


        

    
1...567...81Page 6 of 81